up home page bottom

French German version Spanish version Italian version

header image

Fring me - Mobile Instant Messenger

As a lot of my friends might already know that I use Fring too often. Yes, you could say that am addicted to it. But it’s really cool and let’s me stay connected with everyone - anytime over cellphone. I just updated my Fring version on my cellphone and now even my Y! messenger contacts can IM me (whenever am online on Fring)

For those of you who don’t know what I’m talking about - Fring is a free Instant Messenger that I use on my cellphone to connect to the Live (MSN) Messenger, Google Talk, Y! Messenger, Skype and Twitter. AOL or ICQ users can also use Fring but since I don’t have any friends on those I don’t use it for any of those services. And am sure that my account must have been deactivated since ages!

Most of all, this post would be incomplete if I didn’t write why there’s such a hoopla for Fring, even when there are other IM apps available on the web. It’s because it allows you to call any of your IM contacts for FREE - directly from your phone. Sounds amazing isn’t it? But all you Indian users (or atleast for those who use Vodafone GPRS in India) should know that your ‘Vodafone Connect’ network’s bandwidth is too low to support this without any major time-lags! So expect it to work as a walkie-talkie for sure :P

Anywho - this post is also to let my blog visitors know that you can now instantly  message me if you see that am online on the widget I installed on the sidebar of this blog. (Please  comment on the blog though)

You need a GPRS connectivity on your cellular phone to use this application. Different telecom providers have different GPRS plans that may or may not allow you to use Fring and other high-bandwidth consuming applications. If you have the GPRS plan which allows you to surf the web on your laptop, you should  probably be able to use Fring.

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

SMS Marketing or Text Spam?

Some time back I put a question on Linkedin Answers. For those of you who don’t know about Linkedin - it’s an excellent business networking tool, that helps you to connect with like-minded individuals in your industry/occupation. The Linkedin Answers community is where you can post a question in a relevant category such as marketing, business development,software/design etc. and expect useful answers from people who are experts in that field. Similarly you can answer questions by members on your area(s) of expertise and thus connect with individuals.

sms spam junkAnyway, getting back to the topic : so I posted a question on the Linkedin Answers community (Have you tried SMS (Text) Marketing? Has it worked for your Business?) and here are the two contrasting answers I got:

>I do not approve of SMS marketing. If I am roaming, I have to pay to receive what is mostly spam. How would you like it if you had to pay to read this answer? (Germany)

>Frankly its a personal call about using SMS Marketing. Frankly, I think the novelty of SMS Marketing has worn off and target audiences usually consider it a nuisance rather than an information source, similar to snail mail marketing. (India)

It’s interesting to see how SMS marketing can have different implications on the consumer mindset because of different cost-models at different countries. On one hand, you have a customer who dislikes the nuisance caused by numerous junk SMSs received (most likely someone who lives in India and enjoys FREE incoming SMSs); while on the other hand, there is a customer (in American and European countries…I’m guessing) who despises having to pay the cellular company because of a business-owner’s marketing campaign.

Interestingly the CAN-SPAM act (US Legislation against unsolicited e-mail) does not include SMS marketing between cell-phones. So if I’ve a cellphone in the US and I start messaging a database of cellphone users about my business - the receipents can’t sue me! As per an article I read, there Although, telecoms are trying hard to fight this by blocking commercial messages (using SMS Spam filters) , there is not much that they can do as the amount of these messages are projected to increase. The US Do-not-call Registry will be put to test when these numbers increase.

Meanwhile in India (also the Asia-Pacific region), on an average, a user gets about 8 to 10 commercial messages a week which does not cost a penny to the customer. However, they might want to be a part of the Do-not-call registry for no-nuisance reasons. I doubt if there is any law against commercial messaging in India or the Asian region. No one paid too much heed because it never cost them any money - but now it’s proving to be a real waste of time with an ever-increasing bunch of small businesses using cheap SMS plans and FREE SMS gateway facilities to promote their products.

I wonder if in the near future all our SMS inboxes will have a ‘Junk Mail’ folder.

Here is another interesting article with some more food for thought on SMS marketing. Some inputs of this post were taken from that.

Update:  Another article I came across in relation to this topic.

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Globalizing time for a global business

I came across this article on how GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) should be globalized for businesses across the world. So if a multinational corporation schedules a conference between it’s Hong Kong and US office, they would stick by Zulu time (another term of GMT, often used by commercial pilots). Check out the thought here.

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

“We cater to the world market!”, err and India?

Yesterday I visited a German Architecture and Furnishing Showroom (cum office) to select hardware for the new house I and my family would be moving to soon. As impressed as I was by the quality of the fixtures, it amazed me how there were few that were ‘really’ manufactured for the Indian market. Häfele Hardware is a world-class architecture fittings company that caters to the world market. Or atleast that’s what the salesman said! While the fixtures for wardrobes and doors can be well-adapted by Indian homes - assuming that most Indians wear western formal as well as casual attire, the kitchen fixtures were not even close to the needs of an Indian housewife. Case in point - my mother whose a housewife and has different storage and utility needs which is quite different from that of a Western kitchen. Inquisitively, I asked the salesman - ‘There is nothing here that can be adapted for an Indian kitchen’. His clumsy answer was ‘We cater to the world market’. At that point of time, I said to myself ‘Damn! These guys got the wrong world map!’. With such a huge consumer market, I personally feel, Indians deserve more than what the western companies have to offer. Somehow, us, Indians just can not adapt to everything western! Surely, the western toilet is a lot more comfortable, but we would still love to eat roti-sabzi (rather than microwavable food) the way we’ve been eating since ages! Thus, we need kitchens that got to have the space we need for the rolling pan! We got to have shelves where we can put spices. We got to have more storage for our attas and pickles. NO! We do not need fully-retractable snack packet holders (which look like wending machines). We still need the shelves for PET bottles which will be filled with branded snacks unpacked from their colorful packing! At least, in terms of our eating habits, even the largest multinational food chains need to adapt! (Mc Donald’s Mc Aloo Tikki).

Interestingly (and incidentally), today I read that Ikea (A Swedish furnishing company) took to some baseless commentary on Indian Retail and how there seems to be no future in it. Reliance, Wal-mart and many others think otherwise - for a good reason: Growing consumer demands for a higher standard of living by the huge Indian population!

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Microsoft to take over Yahoo! ?

In a move that could actually change the landscape of online media and search engine marketing, Microsoft has bid $44.6 Billion for Yahoo!

Some repurcussions if this is a successful takeover (just off my head…) :

  • It’s going to be a one-on-one dog-fight between the big two- Google versus Microsoft + Yahoo!
  • We might have Yahoo! Answers, Yahoo! Pipes and other services integrated right into the next version of Windows (GROAN!)
  • Microsoft gets slapped by more Anti-trust cases? :P
  • Microsoft will integrate both the search engines for a superior search engine and syndicate the same results on Yahoo! Search and Live.com . OR from a more strategic perspective: improvize on both the search engines independently and maintain their different USPs (GROAN! for the advertisers). Unless, they bundle this up with promotions for advertisers who advertise on both the search engines

Anywho, this is just off the top and I’m no speculator/analyst. The important question is: What happens next?

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Another desperate attempt by Microsoft?

This is crazy! Microsoft is complaining! Reminds me of school days:

Microsoft is “warning the senator that Google will hurt customer privacy and monopolize the ad media market with higher prices for advertisers (They are saying: “This way we might be able to hurt Google politically if not technologically since we can surely rival their over-80% market share in a jiffy with not-so-competitive technology”)

This strong attack by Microsoft on the search engine company comes after its $3.1 billion purchase of DoubleClick.

Flashback: Microsoft had also bid for the same company and they couldn’t beat Google at it.
Latest News:
Google’s potential acquisition of DoubleClick is now under scrutiny by a U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, and based on yesterday’s hearing, the closing of this deal could still be a long way off.
~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

YouTube: Making money through ads…Finally!

As per a report in The Economic times, Google has formulated plans for generating revenue through its video-sharing portal - YouTube. After getting rid of all the copyright infringing videos and coming to terms with media companies on paper, it’s time they started making some serious money of it.

This is going to be possible with their new advertising 80% transparent overlay at the bottom of each video.

The ads would be targeted on the basis of demographic, location, daypart and genre.

You can either close the ads, click through it to visit the site or click to run a TV-style video.

Well, all this sounds exciting but what I’m wondering if everr professional video content makers, video content publishers or people who create their orignial video content get opportunities to publish ads on to their videos and make money like Google Adsense does for web publishers…

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Microsoft V/s Google

Microsoft is EVIL ?!?!

http://0xfe.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_0xfe_archive.html

~Share BQ Wisdom~
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis